Quoting Doug Anderson (2020-10-29 09:22:55)
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 6:12 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > We should be setting the drm_dp_aux_msg::reply field if a NACK or a
> > SHORT reply happens.
>
> I don't think you update the "reply" field for SHORT, right? You just
> return a dif
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 6:12 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> We should be setting the drm_dp_aux_msg::reply field if a NACK or a
> SHORT reply happens.
I don't think you update the "reply" field for SHORT, right? You just
return a different size?
> Update the error bit handling logic in
> ti_s
We should be setting the drm_dp_aux_msg::reply field if a NACK or a
SHORT reply happens. Update the error bit handling logic in
ti_sn_aux_transfer() to handle these cases and notify upper layers that
such errors have happened. This helps the retry logic understand that a
timeout has happened, or to
