Am 17.02.25 um 17:28 schrieb Simona Vetter:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 05:31:09PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
>> That was purely for the transition from static to dynamic dma-buf
>> handling and can be removed again now.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian König
> Yay!
>
> Might uncover some fun if pe
On 2/11/25 19:31, Christian König wrote:
> That was purely for the transition from static to dynamic dma-buf
> handling and can be removed again now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 34 --
> drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 05:31:09PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> That was purely for the transition from static to dynamic dma-buf
> handling and can be removed again now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König
Yay!
Might uncover some fun if people have meanwhile started to rely on this
for perf
That was purely for the transition from static to dynamic dma-buf
handling and can be removed again now.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 34 --
drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c | 1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
