[PATCH 36/39] drm: hollow-out GET_CLIENT ioctl

2013-07-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 02:12:10PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We not only have debugfs files to do pretty much the equivalent of > lsof, we also have an ioctl. Not that compared to lsof this dumps a > wee bit more information, but we can still get at that from debugfs > easily. > > I've dug aro

Re: [PATCH 36/39] drm: hollow-out GET_CLIENT ioctl

2013-07-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 02:12:10PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We not only have debugfs files to do pretty much the equivalent of > lsof, we also have an ioctl. Not that compared to lsof this dumps a > wee bit more information, but we can still get at that from debugfs > easily. > > I've dug aro

[PATCH 36/39] drm: hollow-out GET_CLIENT ioctl

2013-07-10 Thread Daniel Vetter
We not only have debugfs files to do pretty much the equivalent of lsof, we also have an ioctl. Not that compared to lsof this dumps a wee bit more information, but we can still get at that from debugfs easily. I've dug around in mesa, libdrm and ddx histories and the only users seem to be drm/tes

[PATCH 36/39] drm: hollow-out GET_CLIENT ioctl

2013-07-10 Thread Daniel Vetter
We not only have debugfs files to do pretty much the equivalent of lsof, we also have an ioctl. Not that compared to lsof this dumps a wee bit more information, but we can still get at that from debugfs easily. I've dug around in mesa, libdrm and ddx histories and the only users seem to be drm/tes