Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers

2023-06-15 Thread Karol Herbst
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 1:19 PM Christian König wrote: > > Am 13.06.23 um 16:18 schrieb Karol Herbst: > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 3:59 PM Christian König > > wrote: > >> Am 13.06.23 um 15:05 schrieb Karol Herbst: > >>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 2:40 PM Christian König > >>> wrote: > Am 29.11.

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers

2023-06-15 Thread Christian König
Am 13.06.23 um 16:18 schrieb Karol Herbst: On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 3:59 PM Christian König wrote: Am 13.06.23 um 15:05 schrieb Karol Herbst: On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 2:40 PM Christian König wrote: Am 29.11.22 um 22:14 schrieb Felix Kuehling: On 2022-11-25 05:21, Christian König wrote: Instea

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers

2023-06-13 Thread Karol Herbst
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 3:59 PM Christian König wrote: > > Am 13.06.23 um 15:05 schrieb Karol Herbst: > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 2:40 PM Christian König > > wrote: > >> Am 29.11.22 um 22:14 schrieb Felix Kuehling: > >>> On 2022-11-25 05:21, Christian König wrote: > Instead of a single worke

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers

2023-06-13 Thread Christian König
Am 13.06.23 um 15:05 schrieb Karol Herbst: On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 2:40 PM Christian König wrote: Am 29.11.22 um 22:14 schrieb Felix Kuehling: On 2022-11-25 05:21, Christian König wrote: Instead of a single worker going over the list of delete BOs in regular intervals use a per BO worker which

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers

2023-06-13 Thread Karol Herbst
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 2:40 PM Christian König wrote: > > Am 29.11.22 um 22:14 schrieb Felix Kuehling: > > On 2022-11-25 05:21, Christian König wrote: > >> Instead of a single worker going over the list of delete BOs in regular > >> intervals use a per BO worker which blocks for the resv object an

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers

2022-12-05 Thread Christian König
Am 29.11.22 um 22:14 schrieb Felix Kuehling: On 2022-11-25 05:21, Christian König wrote: Instead of a single worker going over the list of delete BOs in regular intervals use a per BO worker which blocks for the resv object and locking of the BO. This not only simplifies the handling massively,

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers

2022-11-29 Thread Felix Kuehling
On 2022-11-25 05:21, Christian König wrote: Instead of a single worker going over the list of delete BOs in regular intervals use a per BO worker which blocks for the resv object and locking of the BO. This not only simplifies the handling massively, but also results in much better response time

[PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers

2022-11-25 Thread Christian König
Instead of a single worker going over the list of delete BOs in regular intervals use a per BO worker which blocks for the resv object and locking of the BO. This not only simplifies the handling massively, but also results in much better response time when cleaning up buffers. Signed-off-by: Chr