On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 17:19 +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2011-07-13 at 16:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
> > so we do not want the chip to byteswap them on big-endian.
> >
> > We still want to byteswap
On Mit, 2011-07-13 at 16:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
> so we do not want the chip to byteswap them on big-endian.
>
> We still want to byteswap the ring itself and the IBs, so we don't touch
> that but we remov
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 17:19 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2011-07-13 at 16:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
> > so we do not want the chip to byteswap them on big-endian.
> >
> > We still want to byteswap
On Mit, 2011-07-13 at 16:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
> so we do not want the chip to byteswap them on big-endian.
>
> We still want to byteswap the ring itself and the IBs, so we don't touch
> that but we remov
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 10:42 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> > The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
> > so we do not want the chip to byteswap them on big-endian.
> >
> > We still want to byteswap t
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 10:42 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>> wrote:
>> > The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
>> > so we do not want the ch
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 10:42 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>> wrote:
>> > The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
>> > so we do not want the ch
The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
so we do not want the chip to byteswap them on big-endian.
We still want to byteswap the ring itself and the IBs, so we don't touch
that but we remove setting of the byteswap bits in CP_RB_RPTR_ADDR and
IH_CNTL.
In general,
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 10:42 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> > The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
> > so we do not want the chip to byteswap them on big-endian.
> >
> > We still want to byteswap t
The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
so we do not want the chip to byteswap them on big-endian.
We still want to byteswap the ring itself and the IBs, so we don't touch
that but we remove setting of the byteswap bits in CP_RB_RPTR_ADDR and
IH_CNTL.
In general,
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
> so we do not want the chip to byteswap them on big-endian.
>
> We still want to byteswap the ring itself and the IBs, so we don't touch
> that but we remove
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> The writeback ring pointer and IH ring pointer are read using le32_to_cpu
> so we do not want the chip to byteswap them on big-endian.
>
> We still want to byteswap the ring itself and the IBs, so we don't touch
> that but we remove
12 matches
Mail list logo
