[PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: explicit store base gem object in dma_buf->priv

2013-08-14 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 09:10:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Makes it more obviously correct what tricks we play by reusing the drm > prime release helper. > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Ok, to get things going I've merged the two i915 patches to dinq. -Daniel

Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: explicit store base gem object in dma_buf->priv

2013-08-14 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 09:10:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Makes it more obviously correct what tricks we play by reusing the drm > prime release helper. > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Ok, to get things going I've merged the two i915 patches to dinq. -Daniel

[PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: explicit store base gem object in dma_buf->priv

2013-08-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
Makes it more obviously correct what tricks we play by reusing the drm prime release helper. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 21 - 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/d

[PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: explicit store base gem object in dma_buf->priv

2013-08-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
Makes it more obviously correct what tricks we play by reusing the drm prime release helper. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 21 - 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/d