Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/modes: Introduce a whitelist for the named modes

2019-09-03 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Jernej Škrabec wrote: > Hi! > > Dne torek, 27. avgust 2019 ob 13:58:49 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): >> From: Maxime Ripard >> >> The named modes support has introduced a number of glitches that were in >> part due to the fact that the parser will take any string as a na

Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/modes: Introduce a whitelist for the named modes

2019-08-30 Thread Jernej Škrabec
Hi! Dne torek, 27. avgust 2019 ob 13:58:49 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > From: Maxime Ripard > > The named modes support has introduced a number of glitches that were in > part due to the fact that the parser will take any string as a named mode. > > Since we shouldn't have a lot of optio

Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/modes: Introduce a whitelist for the named modes

2019-08-28 Thread Thomas Graichen
hi maxime, On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 1:59 PM Maxime Ripard wrote: > > From: Maxime Ripard > > The named modes support has introduced a number of glitches that were in > part due to the fact that the parser will take any string as a named mode. > > Since we shouldn't have a lot of options there (an

[PATCH 3/4] drm/modes: Introduce a whitelist for the named modes

2019-08-27 Thread Maxime Ripard
From: Maxime Ripard The named modes support has introduced a number of glitches that were in part due to the fact that the parser will take any string as a named mode. Since we shouldn't have a lot of options there (and they should be pretty standard), let's introduce a whitelist of the availabl