On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 10:34:34AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 03:23:31PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> >> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >> >
> >> > Make the atomic private
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 03:23:31PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> > From: Ville Syrjälä
>> >
>> > Make the atomic private object stuff less special by introducing proper
>> > base classes for th
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 03:23:31PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Make the atomic private object stuff less special by introducing proper
> > base classes for the object and its state. Drivers can embed these in
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Make the atomic private object stuff less special by introducing proper
> base classes for the object and its state. Drivers can embed these in
> their own appropriate objects, after which these things will work
>
From: Ville Syrjälä
Make the atomic private object stuff less special by introducing proper
base classes for the object and its state. Drivers can embed these in
their own appropriate objects, after which these things will work
exactly like the plane/crtc/connector states during atomic operations