On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> Since this is all old ums stuff (including the one in the radeon
> driver) I've just tried to perfectly replicate the existing semantics.
>
> Reinventing wait queue code with semantics that differ from all the
> standard linux wait functions
On 12/18/2013 09:25 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:39:27AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Daniel Vetter
>> wrote:
>>> Since this is all old ums stuff (including the one in the radeon
>>> driver) I've just tried to perfectly replicate the exist
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:39:27AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
> > Since this is all old ums stuff (including the one in the radeon
> > driver) I've just tried to perfectly replicate the existing semantics.
> >
> > Reinventing wait queue cod
Since this is all old ums stuff (including the one in the radeon
driver) I've just tried to perfectly replicate the existing semantics.
Reinventing wait queue code with semantics that differ from all the
standard linux wait functions is just hairy, so now we can get rid of
this and so make sure it
