Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop static inline functions intel_guc_submission.c

2021-08-31 Thread John Harrison
Subject should be 'drop .. functions *from* intel...'. On 8/25/2021 20:23, Matthew Brost wrote: s/static inline/static/g + fix function argument alignment to make checkpatch happy. Why? Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost --- .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 116 +

[PATCH 27/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop static inline functions intel_guc_submission.c

2021-08-25 Thread Matthew Brost
s/static inline/static/g + fix function argument alignment to make checkpatch happy. Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost --- .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 116 +- 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submi

[PATCH 27/27] drm/i915/guc: Drop static inline functions intel_guc_submission.c

2021-08-18 Thread Matthew Brost
s/static inline/static/g + fix function argument alignment to make checkpatch happy. Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost --- .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 116 +- 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submi