[PATCH 21/21] drm/i915: No need to wait for eDP power off delay if panel is on

2011-09-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 06:09:53PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > If the panel is powered up, there's no need to delay for the 'off' > interval when turning the panel on. > > Signed-off-by: Keith Packard I'll hold off carefully checking this one until the previous patches settle. Especially when

Re: [PATCH 21/21] drm/i915: No need to wait for eDP power off delay if panel is on

2011-09-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 06:09:53PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > If the panel is powered up, there's no need to delay for the 'off' > interval when turning the panel on. > > Signed-off-by: Keith Packard I'll hold off carefully checking this one until the previous patches settle. Especially when

[PATCH 21/21] drm/i915: No need to wait for eDP power off delay if panel is on

2011-09-29 Thread Keith Packard
If the panel is powered up, there's no need to delay for the 'off' interval when turning the panel on. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c |9 + 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/d

[PATCH 21/21] drm/i915: No need to wait for eDP power off delay if panel is on

2011-09-29 Thread Keith Packard
If the panel is powered up, there's no need to delay for the 'off' interval when turning the panel on. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c |9 + 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/d