On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:14:36AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:56:03PM -0800, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
> > The dma_cache_maint_page function is important for cache maintenance on
> > ARM32 (this was determined via testing).
> >
> > Since we desire direct control of the c
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:14:36AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:56:03PM -0800, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
>> > The dma_cache_maint_page function is important for cache maintenance on
>> > ARM32 (this was d
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:56:03PM -0800, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
> The dma_cache_maint_page function is important for cache maintenance on
> ARM32 (this was determined via testing).
>
> Since we desire direct control of the caches in drm_cache.c, let's make
> a copy of the function, rename it and
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 07:26:11PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:45:28AM -0800, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:45 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux <
> > li...@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > > So no, this is not an acceptable approach.
> > >
> > >
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:45:28AM -0800, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:45 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux <
>> li...@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
>> > So no, this is not an acceptable approach.
>> >
>> > Secondly, i
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:45:28AM -0800, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:45 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux <
> li...@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > So no, this is not an acceptable approach.
> >
> > Secondly, in light of spectre and meltdown, do we _really_ want to
> > export cache f
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:56:03PM -0800, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
> The dma_cache_maint_page function is important for cache maintenance on
> ARM32 (this was determined via testing).
>
> Since we desire direct control of the caches in drm_cache.c, let's make
> a copy of the function, rename it and
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:45 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux <
li...@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:56:03PM -0800, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
> > The dma_cache_maint_page function is important for cache maintenance on
> > ARM32 (this was determined via testing).
> >
> > Since we des
Am Dienstag, den 23.01.2018, 18:56 -0800 schrieb Gurchetan Singh:
> The dma_cache_maint_page function is important for cache maintenance on
> ARM32 (this was determined via testing).
>
> Since we desire direct control of the caches in drm_cache.c, let's make
> a copy of the function, rename it and
The dma_cache_maint_page function is important for cache maintenance on
ARM32 (this was determined via testing).
Since we desire direct control of the caches in drm_cache.c, let's make
a copy of the function, rename it and use it.
v2: Don't use DMA API, call functions directly (Daniel)
Signed-of
10 matches
Mail list logo