On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> It thinks we want to document the __printf(2,0) annotion. Not sure we
> want to teach it about all possible gcc-only flags, hence why I opted
> for the cheap trick of just moving it ahead of the kerneldoc.
>
> This is only a problem for stati
It thinks we want to document the __printf(2,0) annotion. Not sure we
want to teach it about all possible gcc-only flags, hence why I opted
for the cheap trick of just moving it ahead of the kerneldoc.
This is only a problem for static inline functions, since for
non-inline function the kerneldoc
