On 21.01.2016 19:08, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> These should be functionally equivalent to the older per/post modeset
> functions, except that they block out drm_vblank_get right away.
> There's only the clock adjusting code (outside of pageflips) in
> readone which uses drm_vblank_get. But that code d
These should be functionally equivalent to the older per/post modeset
functions, except that they block out drm_vblank_get right away.
There's only the clock adjusting code (outside of pageflips) in
readone which uses drm_vblank_get. But that code doesn't synchronize
against concurrent modesets and
On 14.07.2015 17:13, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 28.05.2015 18:03, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 28.05.2015 17:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:11:53PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 27.05.2015 18:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:21:24PM +0900, Mic
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 04:26:59PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 14.07.2015 17:13, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On 28.05.2015 18:03, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >> On 28.05.2015 17:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:11:53PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 27.05.2015 18:41
On 28.05.2015 18:03, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 28.05.2015 17:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:11:53PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 27.05.2015 18:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:21:24PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 27.05.2015 18:04, Dan
On 28.05.2015 17:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:11:53PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 27.05.2015 18:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:21:24PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 27.05.2015 18:04, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> These should be functiona
On 27.05.2015 18:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:21:24PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 27.05.2015 18:04, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> These should be functionally equivalent to the older per/post modeset
>>> functions, except that they block out drm_vblank_get right away.
>>>
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:11:53PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 27.05.2015 18:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:21:24PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >> On 27.05.2015 18:04, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> These should be functionally equivalent to the older per/post modeset
On 27.05.2015 18:04, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> These should be functionally equivalent to the older per/post modeset
> functions, except that they block out drm_vblank_get right away.
> There's only the clock adjusting code (outside of pageflips) in
> readone which uses drm_vblank_get. But that code d
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:21:24PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 27.05.2015 18:04, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > These should be functionally equivalent to the older per/post modeset
> > functions, except that they block out drm_vblank_get right away.
> > There's only the clock adjusting code (outsi
These should be functionally equivalent to the older per/post modeset
functions, except that they block out drm_vblank_get right away.
There's only the clock adjusting code (outside of pageflips) in
readone which uses drm_vblank_get. But that code doesn't synchronize
against concurrent modesets and
11 matches
Mail list logo