On Wed, 08 Jan 2020, Julian Stecklina
wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 12:24 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 06 Jan 2020, Julian Stecklina
>>
>> wrote:
> [...]
>> > + /* Hypervisor-specific device state. */
>> > + void *vdev;
>>
>> I have no clue about the relative merits of the patch, bu
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 12:24 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jan 2020, Julian Stecklina
> wrote:
[...]
> > + /* Hypervisor-specific device state. */
> > + void *vdev;
>
> I have no clue about the relative merits of the patch, but you can use
> the actual type for the pointer with a forw
On Mon, 06 Jan 2020, Julian Stecklina
wrote:
> Instead of defining KVMGT per-device state in struct intel_vgpu
> directly, add an indirection. This makes the GVT code oblivious of
> what state KVMGT needs to keep.
>
> The intention here is to eventually make it possible to build
> hypervisor back
Instead of defining KVMGT per-device state in struct intel_vgpu
directly, add an indirection. This makes the GVT code oblivious of
what state KVMGT needs to keep.
The intention here is to eventually make it possible to build
hypervisor backends for the mediator, without having to touch the
mediato
