On 05/24/2016 06:51 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Max Staudt wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback! Comments below:
>>
>>
>> On 05/23/2016 03:44 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> Do we _really_ care about fbdev mmap support so much that we want to add
>>> more
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Max Staudt wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for the feedback! Comments below:
>
>
> On 05/23/2016 03:44 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Do we _really_ care about fbdev mmap support so much that we want to add
>> more hacks all over the place (in each driver) to make it w
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the feedback! Comments below:
On 05/23/2016 03:44 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Do we _really_ care about fbdev mmap support so much that we want to add
> more hacks all over the place (in each driver) to make it work? Given that
> fbdev is officially in the "no more drivers"
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:48:52PM +0200, 'Max Staudt wrote:
> From: Max Staudt
>
> This callback from fb_open() allows a fbdev driver to adjust things such
> as file->f_mapping to better represent the internal structures.
>
> This is needed to allow TTM drivers using ttm_fbdev_mmap() to properl
From: Max Staudt
This callback from fb_open() allows a fbdev driver to adjust things such
as file->f_mapping to better represent the internal structures.
This is needed to allow TTM drivers using ttm_fbdev_mmap() to properly
set file->f_mapping to TTM's address_space from bo->bdev->dev_mapping,
