I am under the impression that it only makes sense to call the ATIF
method if the graphics device has an ACPI handle attached. So we could
skip the call altogether if there is no such handle.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Alex Deucher
---
This is only tested on a system where
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> I am under the impression that it only makes sense to call the ATIF
> method if the graphics device has an ACPI handle attached. So we could
> skip the call altogether if there is no such handle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare
> Cc: David A
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> I am under the impression that it only makes sense to call the ATIF
> method if the graphics device has an ACPI handle attached. So we could
> skip the call altogether if there is no such handle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare
> Cc: David A
I am under the impression that it only makes sense to call the ATIF
method if the graphics device has an ACPI handle attached. So we could
skip the call altogether if there is no such handle.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Alex Deucher
---
This is only tested on a system where