[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: use drm_mm_remove_node instead of put_block

2013-07-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: >> > drm_mm_remove_node() does unlink the node but not remove it. Btw., I >> > have these fixes in my series, too. I will push it later and write the >> > git-link to #dri-devel. >> >> We have patches in-flight to convert over to embedded drm_mm

[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: use drm_mm_remove_node instead of put_block

2013-07-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:21:57PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Daniel Vetter > wrote: > > When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in > > > > commit dc9dd7a20fde95aa81a8307cde79c2dff9f83f3d > > Author: Chris Wilson > > Date: Fri Dec

[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: use drm_mm_remove_node instead of put_block

2013-07-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:16:56PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:54PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in > > > > commit dc9dd7a20fde95aa81a8307cde79c2dff9f83f3d > > Author: Chris Wilson > > Date: Fri Dec 7 2

[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: use drm_mm_remove_node instead of put_block

2013-07-01 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in > > commit dc9dd7a20fde95aa81a8307cde79c2dff9f83f3d > Author: Chris Wilson > Date: Fri Dec 7 20:37:07 2012 + > > drm/i915: Preallocate the drm_mm_node prior to mani

[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: use drm_mm_remove_node instead of put_block

2013-07-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in commit dc9dd7a20fde95aa81a8307cde79c2dff9f83f3d Author: Chris Wilson Date: Fri Dec 7 20:37:07 2012 + drm/i915: Preallocate the drm_mm_node prior to manipulating the GTT drm_mm only the allocation side was converted, but not

[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: use drm_mm_remove_node instead of put_block

2013-07-01 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:54PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in > > commit dc9dd7a20fde95aa81a8307cde79c2dff9f83f3d > Author: Chris Wilson > Date: Fri Dec 7 20:37:07 2012 + > > drm/i915: Preallocate the drm_mm_node prior to

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: use drm_mm_remove_node instead of put_block

2013-07-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: >> > drm_mm_remove_node() does unlink the node but not remove it. Btw., I >> > have these fixes in my series, too. I will push it later and write the >> > git-link to #dri-devel. >> >> We have patches in-flight to convert over to embedded drm_mm

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: use drm_mm_remove_node instead of put_block

2013-07-01 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:39:03PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:21:57PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Daniel Vetter > > wrote: > > > When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in > > > > > > commit dc9dd7a

[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: use drm_mm_remove_node instead of put_block

2013-07-01 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:39:03PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:21:57PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Daniel Vetter > > wrote: > > > When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in > > > > > > commit dc9dd7a

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: use drm_mm_remove_node instead of put_block

2013-07-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:21:57PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in > > > > commit dc9dd7a20fde95aa81a8307cde79c2dff9f83f3d > > Author: Chris Wilson > > Date: Fri Dec 7

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: use drm_mm_remove_node instead of put_block

2013-07-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:16:56PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:54PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in > > > > commit dc9dd7a20fde95aa81a8307cde79c2dff9f83f3d > > Author: Chris Wilson > > Date: Fri Dec 7 2

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: use drm_mm_remove_node instead of put_block

2013-07-01 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in > > commit dc9dd7a20fde95aa81a8307cde79c2dff9f83f3d > Author: Chris Wilson > Date: Fri Dec 7 20:37:07 2012 + > > drm/i915: Preallocate the drm_mm_node prior to manip

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: use drm_mm_remove_node instead of put_block

2013-07-01 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:54PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in > > commit dc9dd7a20fde95aa81a8307cde79c2dff9f83f3d > Author: Chris Wilson > Date: Fri Dec 7 20:37:07 2012 + > > drm/i915: Preallocate the drm_mm_node prior to

[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: use drm_mm_remove_node instead of put_block

2013-07-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in commit dc9dd7a20fde95aa81a8307cde79c2dff9f83f3d Author: Chris Wilson Date: Fri Dec 7 20:37:07 2012 + drm/i915: Preallocate the drm_mm_node prior to manipulating the GTT drm_mm only the allocation side was converted, but not