Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: drop the flush on discrete

2021-10-28 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 01:53:32PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: > We were overzealous here; even though discrete is non-LLC, it should > still be always coherent. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld > Cc: Thomas Hellström > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: drop the flush on discrete

2021-10-22 Thread Matthew Auld
On 22/10/2021 10:26, Thomas Hellström wrote: Hi, Matt On 10/21/21 14:53, Matthew Auld wrote: We were overzealous here; even though discrete is non-LLC, it should still be always coherent. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld Cc: Thomas Hellström ---   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 3 ++

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: drop the flush on discrete

2021-10-22 Thread Thomas Hellström
Hi, Matt On 10/21/21 14:53, Matthew Auld wrote: We were overzealous here; even though discrete is non-LLC, it should still be always coherent. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld Cc: Thomas Hellström --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletio

[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: drop the flush on discrete

2021-10-21 Thread Matthew Auld
We were overzealous here; even though discrete is non-LLC, it should still be always coherent. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld Cc: Thomas Hellström --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_