On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 05:33:31PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
This makes perfect sense, but Dave Airlie already sent a similar
patch some two weeks ago, I wonder what happened with it?
Subject "avoid setting 0 depth".
Argh, that he did! I'm not subscribed to dri-devel so I didn't see that.
Di
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:52:30AM -0500, Reza Arbab wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 05:33:31PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
This makes perfect sense, but Dave Airlie already sent a similar
patch some two weeks ago, I wonder what happened with it?
Subject "avoid setting 0 depth".
Argh, that he d
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 9:56 PM Reza Arbab wrote:
> If the scaling loop in drm_fb_helper_single_fb_probe() only finds
> supported depths greater than what it's looking for, it will set
> sizes.surface_depth = 0. This broke my udl device:
>
> [drm] test CRTC 0 primary plane
> udl 3-9.1:1.0: drm_fb
If the scaling loop in drm_fb_helper_single_fb_probe() only finds
supported depths greater than what it's looking for, it will set
sizes.surface_depth = 0. This broke my udl device:
[drm] test CRTC 0 primary plane
udl 3-9.1:1.0: drm_fb_helper_single_fb_probe: test CRTC 0 format 0, depth=24
udl 3-9
