Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/atomic: Pass the full state to CRTC atomic begin and flush

2020-11-02 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:32:22PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > The current atomic helpers have either their object state being passed as > an argument or the full atomic state. > > The former is the pattern that was done at first, before switching to the > latter for new hooks or when it was nee

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/atomic: Pass the full state to CRTC atomic begin and flush

2020-11-02 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:17:44AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 28.10.20 um 13:32 schrieb Maxime Ripard: > > The current atomic helpers have either their object state being passed as > > an argument or the full atomic state. > > > > The former is the pattern that was done at first,

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/atomic: Pass the full state to CRTC atomic begin and flush

2020-11-02 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Am 28.10.20 um 13:32 schrieb Maxime Ripard: > The current atomic helpers have either their object state being passed as > an argument or the full atomic state. > > The former is the pattern that was done at first, before switching to the > latter for new hooks or when it was needed. > > Let's

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/atomic: Pass the full state to CRTC atomic begin and flush

2020-11-01 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 03:55:37PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:32:22PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > The current atomic helpers have either their object state being passed as > > an argument or the full atomic state. > > > > The former is the pattern that was done at

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/atomic: Pass the full state to CRTC atomic begin and flush

2020-10-31 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 1:35 PM Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 10:59:05AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 03:55:37PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:32:22PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > The current atomic helpers have ei

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/atomic: Pass the full state to CRTC atomic begin and flush

2020-10-31 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 10:59:05AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 03:55:37PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:32:22PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > The current atomic helpers have either their object state being passed as > > > an argument or the

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/atomic: Pass the full state to CRTC atomic begin and flush

2020-10-29 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:32:22PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > The current atomic helpers have either their object state being passed as > an argument or the full atomic state. > > The former is the pattern that was done at first, before switching to the > latter for new hooks or when it was nee

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/atomic: Pass the full state to CRTC atomic begin and flush

2020-10-29 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:32:22PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > The current atomic helpers have either their object state being passed as > an argument or the full atomic state. > > The former is the pattern that was done at first, before switching to the > latter for new hooks or when it was nee

[PATCH 2/2] drm/atomic: Pass the full state to CRTC atomic begin and flush

2020-10-29 Thread Maxime Ripard
The current atomic helpers have either their object state being passed as an argument or the full atomic state. The former is the pattern that was done at first, before switching to the latter for new hooks or when it was needed. Let's start convert all the remaining helpers to provide a consiste