[PATCH 19/25] drm: remove the dma_ioctl special-case

2013-08-13 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We might as well have a real ioctl function which checks for the > callbacks. This seems to be a remnant from back in the days when each > drm driver had their own complete ioctl table, with no shared core > drm table at all. > > To make r

Re: [PATCH 19/25] drm: remove the dma_ioctl special-case

2013-08-13 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We might as well have a real ioctl function which checks for the > callbacks. This seems to be a remnant from back in the days when each > drm driver had their own complete ioctl table, with no shared core > drm table at all. > > To make r

[PATCH 19/25] drm: remove the dma_ioctl special-case

2013-08-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
We might as well have a real ioctl function which checks for the callbacks. This seems to be a remnant from back in the days when each drm driver had their own complete ioctl table, with no shared core drm table at all. To make really sure no mis-guided user in a kms driver pops up again explicitl

[PATCH 19/25] drm: remove the dma_ioctl special-case

2013-08-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
We might as well have a real ioctl function which checks for the callbacks. This seems to be a remnant from back in the days when each drm driver had their own complete ioctl table, with no shared core drm table at all. To make really sure no mis-guided user in a kms driver pops up again explicitl