On 15.10.2015 09:36, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> This removes the last depency of radeon for dev->struct_mutex!
>
> Also the locking scheme for hyperz/cmask owners seems a bit unsound,
> there's no protection in the preclose handler (and that never did hold
> dev->struct_mutex while being called). So gr
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Christian König
wrote:
> On 15.10.2015 09:36, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> This removes the last depency of radeon for dev->struct_mutex!
>>
>> Also the locking scheme for hyperz/cmask owners seems a bit unsound,
>> there's no protection in the preclose handler (and
This removes the last depency of radeon for dev->struct_mutex!
Also the locking scheme for hyperz/cmask owners seems a bit unsound,
there's no protection in the preclose handler (and that never did hold
dev->struct_mutex while being called). So grab the same lock there,
too.
There's also all the