On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 05:37:34PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:51:51PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > IRQs are properly shut down, so it almost works as race-free shutdown.
> > Except the irq is stopped after the vblank stuff, so boom anyway.
> > Proper way would be to c
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 05:57:07PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 06:41:05PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 01:03:34PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Liviu
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 06:41:05PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 01:03:34PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:51:51PM +0200, Daniel
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 01:03:34PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:51:51PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >> IRQs are properly shut down, so it almost works as
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:51:51PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> IRQs are properly shut down, so it almost works as race-free shutdown.
> Except the irq is stopped after the vblank stuff, so boom anyway.
> Proper way would be to call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown before any of
> the kms things gets st
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 01:03:34PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:51:51PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> IRQs are properly shut down, so it almost works as race-free shutdown.
> >> Except the irq is stopped after
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:51:51PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> IRQs are properly shut down, so it almost works as race-free shutdown.
>> Except the irq is stopped after the vblank stuff, so boom anyway.
>> Proper way would be to call drm_at
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:51:51PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> IRQs are properly shut down, so it almost works as race-free shutdown.
> Except the irq is stopped after the vblank stuff, so boom anyway.
> Proper way would be to call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown before any of
> the kms th
IRQs are properly shut down, so it almost works as race-free shutdown.
Except the irq is stopped after the vblank stuff, so boom anyway.
Proper way would be to call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown before any of
the kms things gets stopped. So no harm in removing the
drm_vblank_cleanup here really.
Same