[PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: s/mdelay/msleep/ in the sdvo detect function

2012-05-31 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Singh, Satyeshwar wrote: > Is there a reason for the 30 ms delay in the first place? git blame says there is, it supposedely fixes a bug with tv detection. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch - +41 (0) 79 364 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

[PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: s/mdelay/msleep/ in the sdvo detect function

2012-05-31 Thread Singh, Satyeshwar
31, 2012 1:29 AM To: Intel Graphics Development; DRI Development Cc: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: s/mdelay/msleep/ in the sdvo detect function On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:26:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > A 30 ms delay is simply way too big to waste cpu cycles

Re: [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: s/mdelay/msleep/ in the sdvo detect function

2012-05-31 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Singh, Satyeshwar wrote: > Is there a reason for the 30 ms delay in the first place? git blame says there is, it supposedely fixes a bug with tv detection. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch - +41 (0) 79 364 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _

RE: [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: s/mdelay/msleep/ in the sdvo detect function

2012-05-31 Thread Singh, Satyeshwar
, 2012 1:29 AM To: Intel Graphics Development; DRI Development Cc: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: s/mdelay/msleep/ in the sdvo detect function On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:26:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > A 30 ms delay is simply way too big to waste cpu cycles

[PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: s/mdelay/msleep/ in the sdvo detect function

2012-05-31 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:26:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > A 30 ms delay is simply way too big to waste cpu cycles on. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter I've queued this patch here for -next with Chris' irc ack added. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 5

Re: [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: s/mdelay/msleep/ in the sdvo detect function

2012-05-31 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:26:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > A 30 ms delay is simply way too big to waste cpu cycles on. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter I've queued this patch here for -next with Chris' irc ack added. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 4

[PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: s/mdelay/msleep/ in the sdvo detect function

2012-05-24 Thread Daniel Vetter
A 30 ms delay is simply way too big to waste cpu cycles on. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c index 6056603..efa0d17 1

[PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: s/mdelay/msleep/ in the sdvo detect function

2012-05-24 Thread Daniel Vetter
A 30 ms delay is simply way too big to waste cpu cycles on. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c index 6056603..efa0d17 1