On 22 April 2016 at 18:49, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 03:10:44PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> From: Dave Airlie
>>
>> As suggested by Daniel, if we are actively using the connector in a modeset
>> we don't want it to disappear from underneath us. This takes a reference
>> to t
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 03:10:44PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> As suggested by Daniel, if we are actively using the connector in a modeset
> we don't want it to disappear from underneath us. This takes a reference
> to the connector in the atomic paths when we are setting th
From: Dave Airlie
As suggested by Daniel, if we are actively using the connector in a modeset
we don't want it to disappear from underneath us. This takes a reference
to the connector in the atomic paths when we are setting the state up,
and in the non-atomic paths when binding the encoder.
Sign
