Hi
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 02:36:24PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:01:58PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
>> > Whenever we access minor->device, we are in a minor->kdev->...->fops
>> > callback so the minor->kdev
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 02:36:24PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:01:58PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
> > Whenever we access minor->device, we are in a minor->kdev->...->fops
> > callback so the minor->kdev pointer *must* be valid. Thus, simply use
> > minor->kdev->devt i
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:01:58PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
> Whenever we access minor->device, we are in a minor->kdev->...->fops
> callback so the minor->kdev pointer *must* be valid. Thus, simply use
> minor->kdev->devt instead of minor->device and remove the redundant field.
>
> Signed-off
Whenever we access minor->device, we are in a minor->kdev->...->fops
callback so the minor->kdev pointer *must* be valid. Thus, simply use
minor->kdev->devt instead of minor->device and remove the redundant field.
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu
