Hi Tomi
Thank you for the feedback, and sorry for my late responce.
I was under Summer Vacation
> If we have this, of_graph_get_next_ports() returns the ports@0, and that
> makes sense:
>
> parent {
> ports@0 {
> port@0 { };
> };
> };
>
> If we have this, of_graph_g
Hi,
On 09/08/2024 05:10, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
Hi Tomi
Thank you for your review
+/**
+ * of_graph_get_next_ports() - get next ports node.
+ * @parent: pointer to the parent device node
+ * @ports: current ports node, or NULL to get first
+ *
+ * Return: A 'ports' node pointer with refco
Hi Tomi
Thank you for your review
> > +/**
> > + * of_graph_get_next_ports() - get next ports node.
> > + * @parent: pointer to the parent device node
> > + * @ports: current ports node, or NULL to get first
> > + *
> > + * Return: A 'ports' node pointer with refcount incremented. Refcount
> >
On 06/08/2024 07:58, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
We have endpoint base functions
- of_graph_get_next_device_endpoint()
- of_graph_get_device_endpoint_count()
- for_each_of_graph_device_endpoint()
Here, for_each_of_graph_device_endpoint() loop finds each endpoints
po
We have endpoint base functions
- of_graph_get_next_device_endpoint()
- of_graph_get_device_endpoint_count()
- for_each_of_graph_device_endpoint()
Here, for_each_of_graph_device_endpoint() loop finds each endpoints
ports {
port@0 {
(1)