On 3/3/22 09:21, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Donnerstag, dem 03.03.2022 um 04:14 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On 3/2/22 10:23, Lucas Stach wrote:
[...]
I tend to agree with Marek on this one. We have an instance where the
blk-ctrl and the GPC driver between 8m, mini, nano, plus are close,
but differ
On Thu, 2022-03-03 at 09:19 +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 03.03.2022 um 10:54 +0800 schrieb Liu Ying:
> > On Wed, 2022-03-02 at 12:57 +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, dem 02.03.2022 um 17:41 +0800 schrieb Liu Ying:
> > > > On Wed, 2022-03-02 at 10:23 +0100, Lucas Stach
>-Original Message-
>From: Marek Vasut
>Sent: 2022年3月2日 10:50
>To: Robby Cai ; Lucas Stach ;
>Adam Ford
>Cc: Ying Liu (OSS) ; dri-devel
>; devicetree ;
>Peng Fan ; Alexander Stein
>; Rob Herring ;
>Laurent Pinchart ; Sam Ravnborg
>
>Subject: Re: [EXT
Am Donnerstag, dem 03.03.2022 um 04:14 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> On 3/2/22 10:23, Lucas Stach wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > > I tend to agree with Marek on this one. We have an instance where the
> > > > > blk-ctrl and the GPC driver between 8m, mini, nano, plus are close,
> > > > > but differen
Am Donnerstag, dem 03.03.2022 um 10:54 +0800 schrieb Liu Ying:
> On Wed, 2022-03-02 at 12:57 +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, dem 02.03.2022 um 17:41 +0800 schrieb Liu Ying:
> > > On Wed, 2022-03-02 at 10:23 +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > > > Am Mittwoch, dem 02.03.2022 um 03:54 +0100 schr
On 3/3/22 03:54, Liu Ying wrote:
On Wed, 2022-03-02 at 12:57 +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Mittwoch, dem 02.03.2022 um 17:41 +0800 schrieb Liu Ying:
On Wed, 2022-03-02 at 10:23 +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Mittwoch, dem 02.03.2022 um 03:54 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On 3/1/22 14:18, Lucas Stac
On 3/2/22 14:14, Robby Cai wrote:
Hi
[...]
LCDIF on i.MX8MP is a different IP which is borrowed from non-iMX series,
although it's also called 'LCDIF'.
We prefer not mix these two series of IPs in one driver for ease of
maintenance and extension.
Where does the MX8MP LCDIF come from then,
On 3/2/22 10:23, Lucas Stach wrote:
[...]
I tend to agree with Marek on this one. We have an instance where the
blk-ctrl and the GPC driver between 8m, mini, nano, plus are close,
but different enough where each SoC has it's own set of tables and
some checks. Lucas created the framework, and
On Wed, 2022-03-02 at 12:57 +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 02.03.2022 um 17:41 +0800 schrieb Liu Ying:
> > On Wed, 2022-03-02 at 10:23 +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, dem 02.03.2022 um 03:54 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> > > > On 3/1/22 14:18, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > > > >
Am Mittwoch, dem 02.03.2022 um 17:41 +0800 schrieb Liu Ying:
> On Wed, 2022-03-02 at 10:23 +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, dem 02.03.2022 um 03:54 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> > > On 3/1/22 14:18, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > > > Am Dienstag, dem 01.03.2022 um 07:03 -0600 schrieb Adam Ford:
>
On Wed, 2022-03-02 at 10:23 +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 02.03.2022 um 03:54 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> > On 3/1/22 14:18, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, dem 01.03.2022 um 07:03 -0600 schrieb Adam Ford:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 5:05 AM Lucas Stach
> > > > wrote:
> >
Am Mittwoch, dem 02.03.2022 um 03:54 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> On 3/1/22 14:18, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, dem 01.03.2022 um 07:03 -0600 schrieb Adam Ford:
> > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 5:05 AM Lucas Stach wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Am Dienstag, dem 01.03.2022 um 11:19 +0100 schrieb Marek
>-Original Message-
>From: Lucas Stach
>Sent: 2022年3月1日 21:19
>To: Adam Ford
>Cc: Marek Vasut ; Ying Liu (OSS) ;
>dri-devel ; devicetree
>; Peng Fan ; Alexander Stein
>; Rob Herring ;
>Laurent Pinchart ; Sam Ravnborg
>; Robby Cai
>Subject: [EXT] Re: [P
On 3/1/22 14:18, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Dienstag, dem 01.03.2022 um 07:03 -0600 schrieb Adam Ford:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 5:05 AM Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Dienstag, dem 01.03.2022 um 11:19 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On 3/1/22 11:04, Lucas Stach wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Given the two totally differen
On 3/1/22 14:37, Robby Cai wrote:
Hi,
[...]
I tend to agree with Marek on this one. We have an instance where the
blk-ctrl and the GPC driver between 8m, mini, nano, plus are close,
but different enough where each SoC has it's own set of tables and
some checks. Lucas created the framework,
Am Dienstag, dem 01.03.2022 um 07:03 -0600 schrieb Adam Ford:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 5:05 AM Lucas Stach wrote:
> >
> > Am Dienstag, dem 01.03.2022 um 11:19 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> > > On 3/1/22 11:04, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > > Given the two to
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 5:05 AM Lucas Stach wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, dem 01.03.2022 um 11:19 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> > On 3/1/22 11:04, Lucas Stach wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > Given the two totally different IPs, I don't see bugs of IP control
> > > > logics should be fixed for
Am Dienstag, dem 01.03.2022 um 11:19 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> On 3/1/22 11:04, Lucas Stach wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> > > Given the two totally different IPs, I don't see bugs of IP control
> > > logics should be fixed for both drivers. Naturally, the two would
> > > diverge due to differe
On 3/1/22 11:04, Lucas Stach wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Given the two totally different IPs, I don't see bugs of IP control
logics should be fixed for both drivers. Naturally, the two would
diverge due to different HWs. Looking at Patch 9/9, it basically
squashes code to control LCDIFv3 into the mxsfb d
Hi Marek, hi Liu,
Am Dienstag, dem 01.03.2022 um 10:44 +0800 schrieb Liu Ying:
> On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 16:34 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On 2/28/22 09:18, Liu Ying wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
> >
> > > > > On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 01:45 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > > Add compatible stri
On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 16:34 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 2/28/22 09:18, Liu Ying wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> > > > On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 01:45 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > Add compatible string for i.MX8MP LCDIF variant. This is called
> > > > > LCDIFv3
> > > > > and is completely differen
On 2/28/22 09:18, Liu Ying wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 01:45 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
Add compatible string for i.MX8MP LCDIF variant. This is called LCDIFv3
and is completely different from the LCDIFv3 found in i.MX23 in that it
In i.MX23 reference manual, there is no LCDIFv3 found, b
On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 07:57 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 2/28/22 07:37, Liu Ying wrote:
> > Hi Marek,
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 01:45 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > Add compatible string for i.MX8MP LCDIF variant. This is called LCDIFv3
> > > and is completely different from the LCDI
On 2/28/22 07:37, Liu Ying wrote:
Hi Marek,
Hi,
On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 01:45 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
Add compatible string for i.MX8MP LCDIF variant. This is called LCDIFv3
and is completely different from the LCDIFv3 found in i.MX23 in that it
In i.MX23 reference manual, there is no LCDI
Hi Marek,
Thank you for the patch.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 01:45:57AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Add compatible string for i.MX8MP LCDIF variant. This is called LCDIFv3
> and is completely different from the LCDIFv3 found in i.MX23 in that it
> has a completely scrambled register layout compared
Hi Marek,
On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 01:45 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Add compatible string for i.MX8MP LCDIF variant. This is called LCDIFv3
> and is completely different from the LCDIFv3 found in i.MX23 in that it
In i.MX23 reference manual, there is no LCDIFv3 found, but only LCDIF.
> has a compl
Add compatible string for i.MX8MP LCDIF variant. This is called LCDIFv3
and is completely different from the LCDIFv3 found in i.MX23 in that it
has a completely scrambled register layout compared to all previous LCDIF
variants. The new LCDIFv3 also supports 36bit address space. However,
except for
27 matches
Mail list logo
