On Tue, 05 May 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:45:05AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > This is not how we submit subsequent patch-sets.
>
> It is unfortunately how we handle patches on dri-devel&intel-gfx to be
> able to cope with massive mail load. If everyone who submits to
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:45:05AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> This is not how we submit subsequent patch-sets.
It is unfortunately how we handle patches on dri-devel&intel-gfx to be
able to cope with massive mail load. If everyone who submits to intel-gfx
would always resend the entire series for m
In case we unload and load a driver module again that is registering a
lookup table, without this it will result in multiple entries. Provide
an option to remove the lookup table on driver unload
v2: Ccing maintainers
v3: Correct the subject line (Lee jones)
Cc: Samuel Ortiz
Cc: Linus Walleij
C
This is not how we submit subsequent patch-sets.
Please submit them as a whole, seperately from the first submission
and with versioning information i.e. [PATCH v2 X/Y] Stuff ...
> In case we unload and load a driver module again that is registering a
> lookup table, without this it will result i
