On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 08:45:25AM +0100, Frank Binns wrote:
> On 03/08/16 19:04, David Herrmann wrote:
> > The minor referred to by "DRM_MINOR_LEGACY" is called 'dev->primary' and
> > gets 'cardX' as name assigned. Lets reduce this magnificent number of
> > names for the same concept by one and re
On 03/08/16 19:04, David Herrmann wrote:
> The minor referred to by "DRM_MINOR_LEGACY" is called 'dev->primary' and
> gets 'cardX' as name assigned. Lets reduce this magnificent number of
> names for the same concept by one and rename DRM_MINOR_LEGACY to
> DRM_MINOR_PRIMARY (to match the actual str
The minor referred to by "DRM_MINOR_LEGACY" is called 'dev->primary' and
gets 'cardX' as name assigned. Lets reduce this magnificent number of
names for the same concept by one and rename DRM_MINOR_LEGACY to
DRM_MINOR_PRIMARY (to match the actual struct-member name).
Furthermore, this is in no way
