[PATCH 1/7] drm/ttm: don't wait for BO on initial allocation

2016-04-13 Thread Christian König
Am 06.04.2016 um 18:06 schrieb Sinclair Yeh: > I don't know much about AMD gpu. Patches 1-6 look good to me. Does that count as a Reviewed-by or at least Acked-by? Thanks for taking a look, Christian. > > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:12:02AM +0200, Christian König wrote: >> From: Christian Kö

[PATCH 1/7] drm/ttm: don't wait for BO on initial allocation

2016-04-13 Thread Sinclair Yeh
rb for 1-6. I can't really comment on 7. On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 07:38:22PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Am 06.04.2016 um 18:06 schrieb Sinclair Yeh: > >I don't know much about AMD gpu. Patches 1-6 look good to me. > > Does that count as a Reviewed-by or at least Acked-by? > > Thanks for t

[PATCH 1/7] drm/ttm: don't wait for BO on initial allocation

2016-04-06 Thread Christian König
From: Christian König When we use an extern reservation object that otherwise waits for every fence registered with it. Signed-off-by: Christian König Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 18 -- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff -

[PATCH 1/7] drm/ttm: don't wait for BO on initial allocation

2016-04-06 Thread Sinclair Yeh
I don't know much about AMD gpu. Patches 1-6 look good to me. On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:12:02AM +0200, Christian König wrote: > From: Christian König > > When we use an extern reservation object that otherwise waits for every > fence registered with it. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König