[PATCH 1/6] drm: Fix DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV()

2015-03-30 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 03:14:10PM +, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hi Ville, > > On 27 March 2015 at 13:51, wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > Currently DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV does '[DRM_IOCTL_NR(DRM_##ioctl)]' which > > doesn't make much sense since DRM_##ioctl is already a the raw ioctl > > num

[PATCH 1/6] drm: Fix DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV()

2015-03-27 Thread ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
From: Ville Syrjälä Currently DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV does '[DRM_IOCTL_NR(DRM_##ioctl)]' which doesn't make much sense since DRM_##ioctl is already a the raw ioctl number. So change it to 'DRM_IOCTL_NR(DRM_IOCTL_##ioctl) - DRM_COMMAND_BASE' which means the DRM_IOCTL_NR() now makes sense, and also thi

[PATCH 1/6] drm: Fix DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV()

2015-03-27 Thread Emil Velikov
Hi Ville, On 27 March 2015 at 13:51, wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Currently DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV does '[DRM_IOCTL_NR(DRM_##ioctl)]' which > doesn't make much sense since DRM_##ioctl is already a the raw ioctl > number. So change it to 'DRM_IOCTL_NR(DRM_IOCTL_##ioctl) - DRM_COMMAND_BASE' > wh