+ Ville to comment if the removed code loses some meaningful comments
or not. I already went through the code doing consolidations, about a
year ago, so I may be blind to it.
On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 21:19 +, Matthew Auld wrote:
> We duplicate the stolen discovery code in early-quirks and in i915
* Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> + Dave as a heads-up
>
> On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 07:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Matthew Auld wrote:
> >
> > > We duplicate the stolen discovery code in early-quirks and in i915,
> > > however if we just export the region as a resource from early-quirks we
> > >
* Matthew Auld wrote:
> We duplicate the stolen discovery code in early-quirks and in i915,
> however if we just export the region as a resource from early-quirks we
> can nuke the duplication.
>
> Suggested-by: Joonas Lahtinen
> Suggested-by: Chris Wilson
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
> Cc:
+ Dave as a heads-up
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 07:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Matthew Auld wrote:
>
> > We duplicate the stolen discovery code in early-quirks and in i915,
> > however if we just export the region as a resource from early-quirks we
> > can nuke the duplication.
> >
> > Suggeste
We duplicate the stolen discovery code in early-quirks and in i915,
however if we just export the region as a resource from early-quirks we
can nuke the duplication.
Suggested-by: Joonas Lahtinen
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen
Cc: Chris Wilson
Cc: P