Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/msm/dsi: add support for DSI-PHY on SM8350 and SM8450

2022-11-15 Thread Abhinav Kumar
On 11/7/2022 3:02 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: On 07/11/2022 07:27, Abhinav Kumar wrote: On 9/22/2022 4:30 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: SM8350 and SM8450 use 5nm DSI PHYs, which share register definitions with 7nm DSI PHYs. Rather than duplicating the driver, handle 5nm variants inside the c

Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/msm/dsi: add support for DSI-PHY on SM8350 and SM8450

2022-11-07 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On 07/11/2022 07:27, Abhinav Kumar wrote: On 9/22/2022 4:30 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: SM8350 and SM8450 use 5nm DSI PHYs, which share register definitions with 7nm DSI PHYs. Rather than duplicating the driver, handle 5nm variants inside the common 5+7nm driver. I do realize that there is c

Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/msm/dsi: add support for DSI-PHY on SM8350 and SM8450

2022-11-06 Thread Abhinav Kumar
On 9/22/2022 4:30 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: SM8350 and SM8450 use 5nm DSI PHYs, which share register definitions with 7nm DSI PHYs. Rather than duplicating the driver, handle 5nm variants inside the common 5+7nm driver. I do realize that there is common code across PHYs but i am concerned

[PATCH 1/5] drm/msm/dsi: add support for DSI-PHY on SM8350 and SM8450

2022-09-22 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
SM8350 and SM8450 use 5nm DSI PHYs, which share register definitions with 7nm DSI PHYs. Rather than duplicating the driver, handle 5nm variants inside the common 5+7nm driver. Co-developed-by: Robert Foss Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig | 6 +- dr