[PATCH 1/5] [RFC] drm: Documentation style guide

2015-12-08 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello, On Tuesday 08 December 2015 10:59:05 Pierre Moreau wrote: > On 09:49 AM - Dec 08 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Every time I type or review docs this seems a bit different. Try to > > document the common style so we can try to unify at least new docs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter

[PATCH 1/5] [RFC] drm: Documentation style guide

2015-12-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:59:05AM +0100, Pierre Moreau wrote: > On 09:49 AM - Dec 08 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > + > > + Functions which have a non-void return value should > > have a > > + section called "Returns" explaining the expected return values in > > + different cas

[PATCH 1/5] [RFC] drm: Documentation style guide

2015-12-08 Thread Pierre Moreau
Hello Daniel, Just some typo comments below. On 09:49 AM - Dec 08 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Every time I type or review docs this seems a bit different. Try to > document the common style so we can try to unify at least new docs. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > --- > Documentation/DocBoo

[PATCH 1/5] [RFC] drm: Documentation style guide

2015-12-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
Every time I type or review docs this seems a bit different. Try to document the common style so we can try to unify at least new docs. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- Documentation/DocBook/gpu.tmpl | 37 + 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+) diff --git a/Docum