On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Sachin Kamat
wrote:
> On 24 April 2013 09:47, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Sachin Kamat
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> With the merge window for 3.10 about to open shortly, I was wondering
>>> if the tilcdc patches are lined up somewhere
On 24 April 2013 10:08, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Sachin Kamat
> wrote:
>> On 24 April 2013 09:47, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Sachin Kamat
>>> wrote:
Hi Rob,
With the merge window for 3.10 about to open shortly, I was wond
On 24 April 2013 09:47, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Sachin Kamat
> wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> With the merge window for 3.10 about to open shortly, I was wondering
>> if the tilcdc patches are lined up somewhere as I could not find them
>> in linux-next yet.
>
> I don't hav
Hi Rob,
With the merge window for 3.10 about to open shortly, I was wondering
if the tilcdc patches are lined up somewhere as I could not find them
in linux-next yet.
Thanks and regards,
Sachin.
On 27 March 2013 11:53, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2013-03-25 15:36, Rob Clark wrote:
>> sor
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Sachin Kamat
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> With the merge window for 3.10 about to open shortly, I was wondering
> if the tilcdc patches are lined up somewhere as I could not find them
> in linux-next yet.
I don't have any other patches for tilcdc, so if this isn't going
On 24 April 2013 10:08, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> On 24 April 2013 09:47, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Sachin Kamat
>>> wrote:
Hi Rob,
With the merge window for 3.10 about to open shortly, I was wonderi
On 24 April 2013 09:47, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Sachin Kamat
> wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> With the merge window for 3.10 about to open shortly, I was wondering
>> if the tilcdc patches are lined up somewhere as I could not find them
>> in linux-next yet.
>
> I don't hav
Hi Rob,
With the merge window for 3.10 about to open shortly, I was wondering
if the tilcdc patches are lined up somewhere as I could not find them
in linux-next yet.
Thanks and regards,
Sachin.
On 27 March 2013 11:53, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2013-03-25 15:36, Rob Clark wrote:
>> sor
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> On 24 April 2013 09:47, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Sachin Kamat
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> With the merge window for 3.10 about to open shortly, I was wondering
>>> if the tilcdc patches are lined up somewhere
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> With the merge window for 3.10 about to open shortly, I was wondering
> if the tilcdc patches are lined up somewhere as I could not find them
> in linux-next yet.
I don't have any other patches for tilcdc, so if this isn't going
Hi,
On 2013-03-25 15:36, Rob Clark wrote:
> sorry, was offline for a while (moving), and missed the last email..
>
> I would guess that Tomi would send pull-req for tilcdc and omapdrm.
> Well I suppose I could do it if Tomi can't, although my
> pandas/beagles/beaglebones are not unpacked yet..
W
Hi,
On 2013-03-25 15:36, Rob Clark wrote:
> sorry, was offline for a while (moving), and missed the last email..
>
> I would guess that Tomi would send pull-req for tilcdc and omapdrm.
> Well I suppose I could do it if Tomi can't, although my
> pandas/beagles/beaglebones are not unpacked yet..
W
On 25 March 2013 19:06, Rob Clark wrote:
> sorry, was offline for a while (moving), and missed the last email..
No problem :)
>
> I would guess that Tomi would send pull-req for tilcdc and omapdrm.
> Well I suppose I could do it if Tomi can't, although my
> pandas/beagles/beaglebones are not unpa
On 11 March 2013 15:38, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 2 March 2013 20:40, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>> Instead of checking if num_encoders is zero, it is being assigned 0.
>>> Convert the assignment to a check.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin K
On 25 March 2013 19:06, Rob Clark wrote:
> sorry, was offline for a while (moving), and missed the last email..
No problem :)
>
> I would guess that Tomi would send pull-req for tilcdc and omapdrm.
> Well I suppose I could do it if Tomi can't, although my
> pandas/beagles/beaglebones are not unpa
On 11 March 2013 15:38, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 2 March 2013 20:40, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Sachin Kamat
>> wrote:
>>> Instead of checking if num_encoders is zero, it is being assigned 0.
>>> Convert the assignment to a check.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sach
sorry, was offline for a while (moving), and missed the last email..
I would guess that Tomi would send pull-req for tilcdc and omapdrm.
Well I suppose I could do it if Tomi can't, although my
pandas/beagles/beaglebones are not unpacked yet..
BR,
-R
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Sachin Kamat
sorry, was offline for a while (moving), and missed the last email..
I would guess that Tomi would send pull-req for tilcdc and omapdrm.
Well I suppose I could do it if Tomi can't, although my
pandas/beagles/beaglebones are not unpacked yet..
BR,
-R
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Sachin Kamat
Hi Rob,
On 2 March 2013 20:40, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Sachin Kamat
> wrote:
>> Instead of checking if num_encoders is zero, it is being assigned 0.
>> Convert the assignment to a check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
Just curious. W
Hi Rob,
On 2 March 2013 20:40, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> Instead of checking if num_encoders is zero, it is being assigned 0.
>> Convert the assignment to a check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
Just curious. Whic
Instead of checking if num_encoders is zero, it is being assigned 0.
Convert the assignment to a check.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
---
drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.c
b/drivers/gpu
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Instead of checking if num_encoders is zero, it is being assigned 0.
> Convert the assignment to a check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1
Instead of checking if num_encoders is zero, it is being assigned 0.
Convert the assignment to a check.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
---
drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.c
b/drivers/gpu
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Instead of checking if num_encoders is zero, it is being assigned 0.
> Convert the assignment to a check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1
24 matches
Mail list logo
