On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 09:57:31 +0300 Jani Nikula wrote:
> > Removing a nested include exposes all those sites which were
> > erroneously depending upon that nested include. Here's what I have
> > found so far, there will be more.
>
> Right. I didn't hit them with the configs I tried... though I w
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 15:12:35 +0300 Jani Nikula wrote:
>
>> The fault-inject.h users across the kernel need to add a lot of #ifdef
>> CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION to cater for shortcomings in the header. Make
>> fault-inject.h self-contained for CONFIG_FAULT_I
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 15:12:35 +0300 Jani Nikula wrote:
> The fault-inject.h users across the kernel need to add a lot of #ifdef
> CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION to cater for shortcomings in the header. Make
> fault-inject.h self-contained for CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION=n, and add
> stubs for DECLARE_FAULT_ATT
On 13-08-2024 17:42, Jani Nikula wrote:
The fault-inject.h users across the kernel need to add a lot of #ifdef
CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION to cater for shortcomings in the header. Make
fault-inject.h self-contained for CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION=n, and add
stubs for DECLARE_FAULT_ATTR(), setup_fault_at
The fault-inject.h users across the kernel need to add a lot of #ifdef
CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION to cater for shortcomings in the header. Make
fault-inject.h self-contained for CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION=n, and add
stubs for DECLARE_FAULT_ATTR(), setup_fault_attr(), should_fail_ex(),
and should_fail() to
