From: Dave Airlie
So we have to offset manager implementations for dealing with VMA offsets.
GEM had one using the hash table, TTM had one using an rbtree,
I'd rather we just had one to rule them all, since ttm is using the rbtree
variant to allow sub mappings, to keep ABI we need to use that on
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 09:22:26AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:56:18 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > From: Dave Airlie
> >
> > So we have to offset manager implementations for dealing with VMA offsets.
> > GEM had one using the hash table, TTM had one using an rbtree,
> >
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:56:18 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> So we have to offset manager implementations for dealing with VMA offsets.
> GEM had one using the hash table, TTM had one using an rbtree,
>
> I'd rather we just had one to rule them all, since ttm is using the rbtr
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 09:22:26AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:56:18 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > From: Dave Airlie
> >
> > So we have to offset manager implementations for dealing with VMA offsets.
> > GEM had one using the hash table, TTM had one using an rbtree,
> >
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:56:18 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> So we have to offset manager implementations for dealing with VMA offsets.
> GEM had one using the hash table, TTM had one using an rbtree,
>
> I'd rather we just had one to rule them all, since ttm is using the rbtr
From: Dave Airlie
So we have to offset manager implementations for dealing with VMA offsets.
GEM had one using the hash table, TTM had one using an rbtree,
I'd rather we just had one to rule them all, since ttm is using the rbtree
variant to allow sub mappings, to keep ABI we need to use that on