On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 08:33:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 7:06 PM Ville Syrjälä
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 05:23:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Noticed while reviewing code. I'm not sure whether this might or might
> > > not explain some of the
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 7:06 PM Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 05:23:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Noticed while reviewing code. I'm not sure whether this might or might
> > not explain some of the missed vblank hilarity we've been seeing. I
> > think those all go through
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 05:23:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Noticed while reviewing code. I'm not sure whether this might or might
> not explain some of the missed vblank hilarity we've been seeing. I
> think those all go through the vblank completion event, which has
> unconditional barriers
Noticed while reviewing code. I'm not sure whether this might or might
not explain some of the missed vblank hilarity we've been seeing. I
think those all go through the vblank completion event, which has
unconditional barriers - it always takes the spinlock. Therefore no
cc stable.
v2:
- Barrrier
