On Wed, 7 May 2025 14:01:04 +0100
Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> On 06.05.2025 08:54, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 03:21:30 +0100
> > Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> >
> > > Unlike in Panthor, from where this change is based on, there is no need
> > > to support tagging of BO's other than U
On 07.05.2025 14:18, Steven Price wrote:
> On 24/04/2025 03:21, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> > Unlike in Panthor, from where this change is based on, there is no need
> > to support tagging of BO's other than UM-exposed ones, so all strings
> > can be freed with kfree().
> >
> > This commit is done in p
On 24/04/2025 03:21, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> Unlike in Panthor, from where this change is based on, there is no need
> to support tagging of BO's other than UM-exposed ones, so all strings
> can be freed with kfree().
>
> This commit is done in preparation of a following one that will allow
> UM t
On 06.05.2025 08:54, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 03:21:30 +0100
> Adrián Larumbe wrote:
>
> > Unlike in Panthor, from where this change is based on, there is no need
> > to support tagging of BO's other than UM-exposed ones, so all strings
> > can be freed with kfree().
> >
> > Th
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 03:21:30 +0100
Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> Unlike in Panthor, from where this change is based on, there is no need
> to support tagging of BO's other than UM-exposed ones, so all strings
> can be freed with kfree().
>
> This commit is done in preparation of a following one that w
Unlike in Panthor, from where this change is based on, there is no need
to support tagging of BO's other than UM-exposed ones, so all strings
can be freed with kfree().
This commit is done in preparation of a following one that will allow
UM to set BO labels through a new ioctl().
Signed-off-by:
