Hi Tomi
Could we get this in -next before the merge-window starts? Stephen
already ack'ed it.
Thanks
David
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:23 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Stephen Warren
> wrote:
>> On 10/02/2013 08:58 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>> Unfortunately,
Hi
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/02/2013 08:58 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
>> Unfortunately, fbdev does not create its own "struct device" for
>> framebuffers. Instead, it attaches to the device of the parent layer. This
>> has the side-effect that devm_* managed res
On 10/02/2013 08:58 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Unfortunately, fbdev does not create its own "struct device" for
> framebuffers. Instead, it attaches to the device of the parent layer. This
> has the side-effect that devm_* managed resources are not cleaned up on
> framebuffer-destruction but rathe
Unfortunately, fbdev does not create its own "struct device" for
framebuffers. Instead, it attaches to the device of the parent layer. This
has the side-effect that devm_* managed resources are not cleaned up on
framebuffer-destruction but rather during destruction of the
parent-device. In case of
