On March 13, 2025 10:42:10 AM PDT, Aditya Garg wrote:
>I already sent the 1st patch to DRM. I can rebase the test-printf bit to this
>tree. Sounds good?
Yeah, sounds good to me! Thanks :)
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Hi
> On 13 Mar 2025, at 11:10 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:48:32AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
>> So I am fine with this patch:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek
>> Tested-by: Petr Mladek
>>
>>
>> Now, the question is how to get this patch into the mainline.
>>
>> Normal
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:48:32AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> So I am fine with this patch:
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek
> Tested-by: Petr Mladek
>
>
> Now, the question is how to get this patch into the mainline.
>
> Normally, it would make perfect sense to queue it via the DRM tree
> becau
> On 13 Mar 2025, at 2:19 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 07:26:05AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
On 13 Mar 2025, at 12:58 AM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 07:14:36PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2025, at 9:05 PM, Sven Peter
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:06:54AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 13 Mar 2025, at 4:18 PM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Thu 2025-03-13 09:13:23, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >>> On 13 Mar 2025, at 2:27 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> >>> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 08:53:28AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 08:53:28AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 13 Mar 2025, at 2:19 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 07:26:05AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> On 13 Mar 2025, at 12:58 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 07:14:36PM +00
> On 13 Mar 2025, at 4:18 PM, Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> Adding Kees into Cc to resolve how to get this patch into the mainline.
>
> On Thu 2025-03-13 09:13:23, Aditya Garg wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 13 Mar 2025, at 2:27 PM, Andy Shevchenko
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 08:53:28AM +000
Adding Kees into Cc to resolve how to get this patch into the mainline.
On Thu 2025-03-13 09:13:23, Aditya Garg wrote:
>
>
> > On 13 Mar 2025, at 2:27 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 08:53:28AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> On 13 Mar 2025, at 2:19 PM, Andy S
> On 13 Mar 2025, at 2:27 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 08:53:28AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
On 13 Mar 2025, at 2:19 PM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 07:26:05AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
>> On 13 Mar 2025, at 12:58 AM, Andy Shev
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 07:26:05AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 13 Mar 2025, at 12:58 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 07:14:36PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >>> On 12 Mar 2025, at 9:05 PM, Sven Peter wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025, at 13:03, Aditya Garg wrote:
> On 13 Mar 2025, at 12:58 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 07:14:36PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
>>> On 12 Mar 2025, at 9:05 PM, Sven Peter wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025, at 13:03, Aditya Garg wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> I don't have a strong opinion either way: for SMC I
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 07:35:54PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 13 Mar 2025, at 12:58 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 07:14:36PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2025, at 9:05 PM, Sven Peter wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025, at 13:03, Aditya Garg wrote:
> On 13 Mar 2025, at 12:58 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 07:14:36PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
On 12 Mar 2025, at 9:05 PM, Sven Peter wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025, at 13:03, Aditya Garg wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> I don't have a strong opinion either way: for SMC
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 07:14:36PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 12 Mar 2025, at 9:05 PM, Sven Peter wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2025, at 13:03, Aditya Garg wrote:
...
> > I don't have a strong opinion either way: for SMC I just need to print
> > FourCC keys for debugging / information in a fe
> On 12 Mar 2025, at 9:05 PM, Sven Peter wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025, at 13:03, Aditya Garg wrote:
On 12 Mar 2025, at 5:29 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
Am 12.03.25 um 12:49 schrieb Aditya Garg:
>> On 12 Mar 2025, at 5:16 PM, Thomas Zimmerm
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025, at 13:03, Aditya Garg wrote:
>> On 12 Mar 2025, at 5:29 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>>> Am 12.03.25 um 12:49 schrieb Aditya Garg:
>>>
> On 12 Mar 2025, at 5:16 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
> Am 12.03.25 um 10:05 schrieb Adi
> On 12 Mar 2025, at 5:33 PM, Aditya Garg wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 12 Mar 2025, at 5:29 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
Am 12.03.25 um 12:49 schrieb Aditya Garg:
>>>
> On 12 Mar 2025, at 5:16 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
> Am 12.03.25 um 10:05 schri
> On 12 Mar 2025, at 5:29 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>> Am 12.03.25 um 12:49 schrieb Aditya Garg:
>>
On 12 Mar 2025, at 5:16 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
Am 12.03.25 um 10:05 schrieb Aditya Garg:
From: Hector Martin
%p4cc is designed f
Hi
Am 12.03.25 um 12:49 schrieb Aditya Garg:
On 12 Mar 2025, at 5:16 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 12.03.25 um 10:05 schrieb Aditya Garg:
From: Hector Martin
%p4cc is designed for DRM/V4L2 FourCCs with their specific quirks, but
it's useful to be able to print generic 4-character c
> On 12 Mar 2025, at 5:16 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>> Am 12.03.25 um 10:05 schrieb Aditya Garg:
>> From: Hector Martin
>>
>> %p4cc is designed for DRM/V4L2 FourCCs with their specific quirks, but
>> it's useful to be able to print generic 4-character codes formatted as
>> an in
Hi
Am 12.03.25 um 10:05 schrieb Aditya Garg:
From: Hector Martin
%p4cc is designed for DRM/V4L2 FourCCs with their specific quirks, but
it's useful to be able to print generic 4-character codes formatted as
an integer. Extend it to add format specifiers for printing generic
32-bit FourCCs with
From: Hector Martin
%p4cc is designed for DRM/V4L2 FourCCs with their specific quirks, but
it's useful to be able to print generic 4-character codes formatted as
an integer. Extend it to add format specifiers for printing generic
32-bit FourCCs with various endian semantics:
%p4ch Host byte or
22 matches
Mail list logo