On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:15:41 +
Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> > (Resending in two bits to avoid stgit breakage)
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> Any of these important enough for -fixes? or -next good enough?
The cache one maybe the others can wait. Both though are
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> (Resending in two bits to avoid stgit breakage)
Hi Alan,
Any of these important enough for -fixes? or -next good enough?
Dave.
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:15:41 +
Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> > (Resending in two bits to avoid stgit breakage)
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> Any of these important enough for -fixes? or -next good enough?
The cache one maybe the others can wait. Both though are
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> (Resending in two bits to avoid stgit breakage)
Hi Alan,
Any of these important enough for -fixes? or -next good enough?
Dave.
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.fr
(Resending in two bits to avoid stgit breakage)
From: Alan Cox
This was reported a long time ago (and I apologize to whoever it was that
reported it as I've lost the original report).
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 d
(Resending in two bits to avoid stgit breakage)
From: Alan Cox
This was reported a long time ago (and I apologize to whoever it was that
reported it as I've lost the original report).
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 d
