On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:55:08AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Since commit 241d2fb56a18 ("of: Make OF framebuffer device names unique"),
> as spotted by Frédéric Bonnard, the historical "of-display" device is
> gone: the updated logic creates "of-display.0" instead, then as many
> "of-display.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 08:24:34AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 6/15/23 23:19, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > Rob Herring (2023-06-15):
> > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 03:21:07PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > > > At the time this was proposed it was said that "of-display", is wro
On 6/15/23 23:19, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi Rob,
Rob Herring (2023-06-15):
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 03:21:07PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
At the time this was proposed it was said that "of-display", is wrong,
and that "of-display.0" must be used for the first device instead, and
if somethin
Hi Rob,
Rob Herring (2023-06-15):
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 03:21:07PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > At the time this was proposed it was said that "of-display", is wrong,
> > and that "of-display.0" must be used for the first device instead, and
> > if something breaks an alias can be provid
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 03:21:07PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 03:06:28PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Am 15.06.23 um 15:03 schrieb Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis):
> > > On 16.04.23 14:34, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > >
Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
(2023-06-15):
> No reply to my status inquiry[1] a few weeks ago, so I have to assume
> nobody cares anymore. If somebody still cares, holler!
I still care about a proper bugfix, for upstream and for the Debian
distribution, and so does Salvatore. Bu
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 03:06:28PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 15.06.23 um 15:03 schrieb Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis):
> > On 16.04.23 14:34, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:55:08AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > > S
Hi
Am 15.06.23 um 15:03 schrieb Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis):
On 16.04.23 14:34, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:55:08AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Since commit 241d2fb56a18 ("of: Make OF framebuffer device names unique"),
as spotted by Frédéric Bonn
On 16.04.23 14:34, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:55:08AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Since commit 241d2fb56a18 ("of: Make OF framebuffer device names unique"),
>> as spotted by Frédéric Bonnard, the historical "of-display" device is
>> gone: the updated logic crea
Hi Cyril,
CC DT
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:05 PM Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Since commit 241d2fb56a18 ("of: Make OF framebuffer device names unique"),
> as spotted by Frédéric Bonnard, the historical "of-display" device is
> gone: the updated logic creates "of-display.0" instead, then as many
> "o
On 4/12/23 11:55, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Since commit 241d2fb56a18 ("of: Make OF framebuffer device names unique"),
as spotted by Frédéric Bonnard, the historical "of-display" device is
gone: the updated logic creates "of-display.0" instead, then as many
"of-display.N" as required.
This means th
Hi
looping in as well the regressions list (hoping not doing any mistake
with the regzbot commands):
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:55:08AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Since commit 241d2fb56a18 ("of: Make OF framebuffer device names unique"),
> as spotted by Frédéric Bonnard, the historical "of-d
Since commit 241d2fb56a18 ("of: Make OF framebuffer device names unique"),
as spotted by Frédéric Bonnard, the historical "of-display" device is
gone: the updated logic creates "of-display.0" instead, then as many
"of-display.N" as required.
This means that offb no longer finds the expected device
13 matches
Mail list logo
