Hi,
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 9:08 AM Bjorn Andersson
wrote:
>
> On Fri 02 Oct 15:42 CDT 2020, Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 3:40 PM Bjorn Andersson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > While the signal on GPIO4 to drive the backlight controller indeed is
> > > pulse width modula
On Fri 02 Oct 15:42 CDT 2020, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 3:40 PM Bjorn Andersson
> wrote:
> >
> > While the signal on GPIO4 to drive the backlight controller indeed is
> > pulse width modulated its purpose is specifically to control the
> > brightness of a backlight.
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:35:31 -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> While the signal on GPIO4 to drive the backlight controller indeed is
> pulse width modulated its purpose is specifically to control the
> brightness of a backlight.
>
> Drop the #pwm-cells and instead expose a new property to configure
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 3:40 PM Bjorn Andersson
wrote:
>
> While the signal on GPIO4 to drive the backlight controller indeed is
> pulse width modulated its purpose is specifically to control the
> brightness of a backlight.
I'm a bit on the fence about this. I guess you're doing this becau
While the signal on GPIO4 to drive the backlight controller indeed is
pulse width modulated its purpose is specifically to control the
brightness of a backlight.
Drop the #pwm-cells and instead expose a new property to configure the
granularity of the backlight PWM signal.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn An
On 9/30/20 5:35 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> While the signal on GPIO4 to drive the backlight controller indeed is
> pulse width modulated its purpose is specifically to control the
> brightness of a backlight.
>
> Drop the #pwm-cells and instead expose a new property to configure the
> granulari
