[PATCH 1/2] drm: Mark up legacy/dri1 drivers with DRM_LEGACY

2016-08-04 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > It's super confusing that new drivers need to be marked with > DRIVER_MODESET when really it means DRIVER_MODERN. Much better to > invert the meaning and rename it to something that's suitably > off-putting. > > Since there's over 100 plac

[PATCH 1/2] drm: Mark up legacy/dri1 drivers with DRM_LEGACY

2016-08-04 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 09:32:01AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Daniel Vetter > wrote: > > It's super confusing that new drivers need to be marked with > > DRIVER_MODESET when really it means DRIVER_MODERN. Much better to > > invert the meaning and rename

[PATCH 1/2] drm: Mark up legacy/dri1 drivers with DRM_LEGACY

2016-08-04 Thread Frank Binns
On 03/08/16 20:11, Daniel Vetter wrote: > It's super confusing that new drivers need to be marked with > DRIVER_MODESET when really it means DRIVER_MODERN. Much better to > invert the meaning and rename it to something that's suitably > off-putting. > > Since there's over 100 places using DRIVER_MO

[PATCH 1/2] drm: Mark up legacy/dri1 drivers with DRM_LEGACY

2016-08-03 Thread Daniel Vetter
It's super confusing that new drivers need to be marked with DRIVER_MODESET when really it means DRIVER_MODERN. Much better to invert the meaning and rename it to something that's suitably off-putting. Since there's over 100 places using DRIVER_MODESET we need to roll out this change without a fla