Hi Andy,
On 11/14/24 1:50 AM, Andy Yan wrote:
Hi,
At 2024-05-06 15:44:36, "Quentin Schulz" wrote:
Hi Heiko,
On 4/25/24 9:55 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
From: Heiko Stuebner
The clock is in Hz while the value checked against is in kHz, so
actual frequencies will never be able to be below to
Hi Quetin,
At 2024-11-14 17:38:56, "Quentin Schulz" wrote:
>Hi Andy,
>
>On 11/14/24 1:50 AM, Andy Yan wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> At 2024-05-06 15:44:36, "Quentin Schulz" wrote:
>>> Hi Heiko,
>>>
>>> On 4/25/24 9:55 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
From: Heiko Stuebner
The clock is in Hz w
Hi,
At 2024-05-06 15:44:36, "Quentin Schulz" wrote:
>Hi Heiko,
>
>On 4/25/24 9:55 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>> From: Heiko Stuebner
>>
>> The clock is in Hz while the value checked against is in kHz, so
>> actual frequencies will never be able to be below to max value.
>> Fix this by specifyin
+ Sebastina,
Hi Sebastian, I think you also need this patch when you test DSI on rk3588
with DSI2 support patch from Heiko.
At 2024-04-26 03:55:05, "Heiko Stuebner" wrote:
>From: Heiko Stuebner
>
>The clock is in Hz while the value checked against is in kHz, so
>actual frequencies will never
Hi Heiko,
On 4/25/24 9:55 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
From: Heiko Stuebner
The clock is in Hz while the value checked against is in kHz, so
actual frequencies will never be able to be below to max value.
Fix this by specifying the max-value in Hz too.
Fixes: 5a028e8f062f ("drm/rockchip: vop2: A
From: Heiko Stuebner
The clock is in Hz while the value checked against is in kHz, so
actual frequencies will never be able to be below to max value.
Fix this by specifying the max-value in Hz too.
Fixes: 5a028e8f062f ("drm/rockchip: vop2: Add support for rk3588")
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner
