On Thursday 12 June 2014 17:04:34 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> In which case, that's a bug for DRM_PANEL_SIMPLE which uses the same
> mechanism. Since everything is going to be in the same boat, the
> menu should depend on DRM && DRM_PANEL.
>
Right, I actually have a patch for DRM_PANEL_
On Thursday 12 June 2014 16:50:15 Russell King wrote:
> DRM_PANEL_LD9040 and DRM_PANEL_S6E8AA0 both explicitly depended on
> DRM_PANEL && DRM. This is nonsense for two reasons:
>
> (a) DRM_PANEL already depends on DRM, so DRM_PANEL can not be enabled
> without DRM first being enabled. Hence the
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 06:00:07PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 12 June 2014 16:50:15 Russell King wrote:
> > DRM_PANEL_LD9040 and DRM_PANEL_S6E8AA0 both explicitly depended on
> > DRM_PANEL && DRM. This is nonsense for two reasons:
> >
> > (a) DRM_PANEL already depends on DRM, so DR
DRM_PANEL_LD9040 and DRM_PANEL_S6E8AA0 both explicitly depended on
DRM_PANEL && DRM. This is nonsense for two reasons:
(a) DRM_PANEL already depends on DRM, so DRM_PANEL can not be enabled
without DRM first being enabled. Hence the && DRM is useless.
(b) These two configs are already beneath a
