From: Gustavo Padovan
When mode's vrefresh is zero we should ask DRM core to calculate vrefresh
for us so we can get the correct value instead of relying on fixed value
defined in a macro. But if vrefresh is still zero we should fail the
update.
Suggested-by: Daniel Stone
Signed-off-by: Gustavo
On 2015-05-20 16:33, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan
>
> When mode's vrefresh is zero we should ask DRM core to calculate
> vrefresh
> for us so we can get the correct value instead of relying on fixed
> value
> defined in a macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan
> ---
> dr
Hi,
On 20 May 2015 at 17:58, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
> On 2015-05-20 16:33, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
>> When mode's vrefresh is zero we should ask DRM core to calculate vrefresh
>> for us so we can get the correct value instead of relying on fixed value
>> defined in a macro.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gust
Hi,
2015-05-20 Daniel Stone :
> Hi,
>
> On 20 May 2015 at 17:58, Tobias Jakobi
> wrote:
> > On 2015-05-20 16:33, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> >> When mode's vrefresh is zero we should ask DRM core to calculate vrefresh
> >> for us so we can get the correct value instead of relying on fixed value
>
From: Gustavo Padovan
When mode's vrefresh is zero we should ask DRM core to calculate vrefresh
for us so we can get the correct value instead of relying on fixed value
defined in a macro.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 in
